Page 1 of 1

Ascendis Caller ID beta version 2.1.0.0 now available

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:31 pm
by Bill Root
Version 2.1.0.0 includes the following changes from the previous release:

- fixed Network Status window getting moved from secondary monitor (left of primary monitor) to primary monitor when closed and opened within a session
- removed separate "Log on to incoming mail server before sending mail" option (Options window, Mail page) -- set Authentication to "POP3 Login" instead
- added TLS login support for mail server (Options window, Mail page)
- added "Log mail communications to Activity Log" to Options window, Mail page
- fixed EIntOverflow exception on systems w/o sound when running script
- added POP3 port setting to Mail page of Options window
- fixed Repair Modem problem under Vista in certain cases
- moved device settings from registry to ini file
- support loading GIF files for contact images
- keep windows accessible on startup on multiple monitor systems when monitor arrangement has changed
- added preliminary SIP support (not completed yet!)


As always, bug reports and feedback are appreciated.


You can download this version here:
http://ascendis.com/callerid/CallerID_Beta_Setup.exe

The beta page is available here:
http://ascendis.com/callerid/beta.php

Problem with beta version 2.1.0.0 and no sound device

Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 5:53 am
by Bill Root
Thanks to an astute customer, we have discovered a problem with Ascendis Caller ID beta version 2.1.0.0 on systems with no sound device. In this case Ascendis Caller ID will crash on startup. We hope to have a fix for this in the next beta version.

Finest regards,
Bill Root
Ascendis Software

Lengthy Load Time

Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 5:40 am
by lgregmiller
On my machine, beta 2.1.0.0 takes a very long time to load - on the order of ten seconds. Much longer than 2.0.2.0 beta did.

Re: Lengthy Load Time

Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 6:24 am
by Bill Root
Hi Greg,

I assume this is repeatable? The first time this version runs it will perform some one-time operations. Afterwards I expect it to perform similar to previous beta versions. And, of course, 2.0.2.0 was not a beta, which means it would be faster than non-beta versions.

It could be that something else is going on, though. What type and speed of processor does your computer have? Is it a desktop or laptop computer?

Finest regards,
Bill Root
Ascendis Software