Call Waiting Caller ID
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2014 9:50 am
I read a post from a couple of years ago - the question regarding display of call waiting CID was asked.
I agree that it seems a modem has not yet been developed and probably never will be that provides a Call Waiting CID message unless it is connected to a distant modem exchanging data.
I am wondering whether a v.92 pci modem could be spoofed into 'thinking' it is connected and therefore issue the Call Waiting CID message. I figure I could put a resistive load across the modem to give it a loop, put a capacitor in series on each side of the modem line to the telephone line to keep the modem from picking up the line, and issuing an AT command to place the modem off-hook. All messages (if any) from the modem would be of the Call Waiting CID type.
There would be no DC voltage to the modem's line, which might be a problem.... but maybe could be overcome.
Does Ascendis need the 'RING' message word to trigger its process? Or does it just need the incoming message. There would no longer be a 'RING' message.
What am I over looking? Seems too simple to work.
Thank you,
Frank
I agree that it seems a modem has not yet been developed and probably never will be that provides a Call Waiting CID message unless it is connected to a distant modem exchanging data.
I am wondering whether a v.92 pci modem could be spoofed into 'thinking' it is connected and therefore issue the Call Waiting CID message. I figure I could put a resistive load across the modem to give it a loop, put a capacitor in series on each side of the modem line to the telephone line to keep the modem from picking up the line, and issuing an AT command to place the modem off-hook. All messages (if any) from the modem would be of the Call Waiting CID type.
There would be no DC voltage to the modem's line, which might be a problem.... but maybe could be overcome.
Does Ascendis need the 'RING' message word to trigger its process? Or does it just need the incoming message. There would no longer be a 'RING' message.
What am I over looking? Seems too simple to work.
Thank you,
Frank